[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position

On 21 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:

>Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> writes:
>> Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
>>    No.  It is my understanding that it would be good to have "fresh
>>    blood" in the team.  Working on security can cost a lot of time,
>>    thus it could even be helpful not being a Debian developer since
>>    that implies active package maintenance as well.  However, similar
>>    knowledge is very helpful, and may be required when working on
>>    issues.
>I think the security secretary, if we have one, should be a Debian

I take it then that you volunteer.  If not, shut up.  Throwing artifical 
barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers.

>But it doesn't have to be someone who is already a Debian developer,
>and I have no objection to fast-tracking their application.  

Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!

Who is John Galt?  galt@inconnu.isu.edu

Reply to: