Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position
On 21 Oct 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>Martin Schulze <email@example.com> writes:
>> Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
>> No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have "fresh
>> blood" in the team. Working on security can cost a lot of time,
>> thus it could even be helpful not being a Debian developer since
>> that implies active package maintenance as well. However, similar
>> knowledge is very helpful, and may be required when working on
>I think the security secretary, if we have one, should be a Debian
I take it then that you volunteer. If not, shut up. Throwing artifical
barriers at this office isn't going to add volunteers.
>But it doesn't have to be someone who is already a Debian developer,
>and I have no objection to fast-tracking their application.
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? firstname.lastname@example.org