Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position
Matt Zimmerman <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:23:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Martin Schulze <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
> > >
> > > No. It is my understanding that it would be good to have "fresh
> > > blood" in the team. Working on security can cost a lot of time,
> > > thus it could even be helpful not being a Debian developer since
> > > that implies active package maintenance as well. However,
> > > similar knowledge is very helpful, and may be required when
> > > working on issues.
> > I think the security secretary, if we have one, should be a Debian
> > developer.
> We have two of them, and they are both card-carrying developers.
Sorry; I was referring to the Q&A, not the present incumbents.