[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position



Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:

> On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 09:23:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> 
> > Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> writes:
> > 
> > > Q: Is a requirement being a Debian developer?
> > > 
> > >    No.  It is my understanding that it would be good to have "fresh
> > >    blood" in the team.  Working on security can cost a lot of time,
> > >    thus it could even be helpful not being a Debian developer since
> > >    that implies active package maintenance as well.  However,
> > >    similar knowledge is very helpful, and may be required when
> > >    working on issues.
> > 
> > I think the security secretary, if we have one, should be a Debian
> > developer.
> 
> We have two of them, and they are both card-carrying developers.

Sorry; I was referring to the Q&A, not the present incumbents.



Reply to: