[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [ OT ] local packages vs official packages



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "Samu" == Samu  <samu@linuxasylum.net> writes:

Samu> hi, this is just a curiosity, i think is not so security related,
Samu> aniway...  if i made a package by my self, or from deb sources, of
Samu> a package that already exist on to the debian db, and my "local"
Samu> package is called as the official one, when i run then dselect or
Samu> apt, they overwrite my local pkg for the official one.  i have to
Samu> explicity "hold" the local package to not to have overwritten.
Samu> why ? they aren't checked only for the version number ?

If your package is the same version number as the official one, but are
different (I guess different MD5 sums and/or size is how apt checks it),
then apt will try to reinstall.

Add an entry to the debian/changelog.  For example, if the current
release is 4.5-2 (just pulling a random number out of the air), then add
an entry calling it 4.5-2.1 or something like that.

- -- 
Hubert Chan <hackerhue@geek.com> - http://www.geocities.com/hubertchan/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/651854DF71FDA37F
Fingerprint: 6CC5 822D 2E55 494C 81DD  6F2C 6518 54DF 71FD A37F
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Please encrypt *all* e-mail to me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7jC05ZRhU33H9o38RAsP9AKCk8X4eqGwpPyyfTZV1hLuSejvqMwCfYA5M
XKfvX1Pg9SnFaRbde5h8ysk=
=Cezj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: