Delivery Failure: Re: Mutt and inline gpg

[iComMand Support <support@conexys.co.za>]

Your message, Re: Mutt and inline gpg,
was not delivered to the following recipient:
evosloo@xsinet.co.za

Reason: System error: Please re-send your message later.
Recipient: evosloo@xsinet.co.za

--- Begin Message ---

• To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
• Cc: Rob VanFleet <rvf@linux.wku.edu>
• Subject: Re: Mutt and inline gpg
• From: Nathan E Norman <nnorman@micromuse.com>
• Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 19:19:36 -0500
• Message-id: <[🔎] 20010809191936.A19631@micromuse.com>
• Mail-followup-to: debian-security@lists.debian.org, Rob VanFleet <rvf@linux.wku.edu>
• In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010809155114.C25103@linux.wku.edu>
• References: <[🔎] 20010809115549.K21362@mykene.esat.kuleuven.ac.be> <[🔎] 20010809200315.C21441@cse.unsw.edu.au> <[🔎] 20010809151942.A802@martin.vie.ims> <[🔎] 20010809172650.O7253@salem.getuid.de> <[🔎] 20010809155114.C25103@linux.wku.edu>

On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:51:14PM -0500, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:26:50PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > option "pgp_create_traditional". That option might help you very much,
> > but instead I would suggest that the other MUA's get fixed.
> 
> Um, wouldn't that be every other MUA asid from mutt and maybe one or two
> others?

For values of "one or two" at about 15 or so, sure.  Someone recently
posted a long list of MUAs which are PGP/MIME compliant - most of the
important names were there.

-- 
Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better
Micromuse Ltd.                 | than a perfect plan tomorrow.
mailto:nnorman@micromuse.com   |   -- Patton

Attachment: pgpAdbje_MQyo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---