secured bind default?
Hi,
It is known that running a domain name server in a chroot jail is more
secure than running it the default way. I have also heard this about other
packages. So my question: would it not be smart/handy to have this
opportunity during install? When installing bind, a question could be
asked if you want it run default or in a chroot enviro. I do not think it
is very difficult to extend the installation scripts? It would make
security easier.
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
--
NT is the OS of the future. The main engine is the 16-bit Subsystem
(also called MS-DOS Subsystem). Above that, there is the windoze 95/98
16-bit Subsystem. Anyone can see that 16+16=32, so windoze NT is a
*real* 32-bit system.
Reply to: