[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rlinetd security



In message <[🔎] 20010619115405.A23473@ksu.edu>, Joseph Pingenot writes:
>While we're at it, it'd be nice if the packages (on an update) didn't re-enable
>themselves if I've disabled them.  Inetd should check each of the runlevels to
>see if it's currently enabled (/etc/rc?.d).  If it's not, it shouldn't make it
>so.  The same goes for all the other services in /etc/rc?.d.  Also, if it
>isn't listed in /etc/inetd.conf, the admin has probably removed it, and it
>shouldn't add itself back in.
>Just something that's annoyed me when updating daily.  :)

They don't.  If you leave any /etc/rc?.d links in place (I use a harmless K??
link), then any upgrade of that package will never re-enable the service.
Check out the man page for update-rc.d for more information.  I think 
update-inetd has a similar functionality.

--
Ted Cabeen           http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen         secabeen@pobox.com
Check Website or Keyserver for PGP/GPG Key BA0349D2      secabeen@uchicago.edu
"I have taken all knowledge to be my province." -F. Bacon  secabeen@cabeen.org
"Human kind cannot bear very much reality."-T.S.Eliot        cabeen@netcom.com


Attachment: pgphZPd4VcRCH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: