Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?

To: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr@clipper.net>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
From: Kevin van Haaren <kevin@vanhaaren.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:24:35 -0600
Message-id: <p05001901b6c55d451e5d@[192.168.128.101]>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010302060852.B5599@funk.meus0002.clipper.net>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.30.0103010914210.16435-100000@login1.powertech.no> <[🔎] 20010228235132.Q6270@plato.local.lan> <[🔎] 20010301050743.A24143@funk.meus0002.clipper.net> <[🔎] 20010301063243.V6270@plato.local.lan> <[🔎] 87y9uoxxnw.fsf@manon.pvv.ntnu.no> <[🔎] 20010302060852.B5599@funk.meus0002.clipper.net>

At 06:08 +0000 3/2/2001, Jacob Meuser wrote:

I believe it becomes uncommented if one installs over the network?  (That
would make sense to ME anyway.)

<jakemsr@clipper.net>

It didn't on my network install. I did an FTP install of PowerPCDebian (Potato). I had to uncomment the security line after installwas complete, then run deselect to update.


Kevin

Reply to:

References:
- SSH with potato, not very secure?
  - From: Runar Bell <runarbel@powertech.no>
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
  - From: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr@clipper.net>
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
  - From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
  - From: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr@clipper.net>

Prev by Date: Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
Next by Date: Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
Previous by thread: Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
Next by thread: Re: SSH with potato, not very secure?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread