Re: portsentry dangerous? hardly; RTFM. (was Re: checking security logs)
thomas lakofski <thomas@88.net> writes:
> On 30 Jan 2001, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> leaving aside the above...
... for obvious reasons.
> > > > They will, as demonstrated above.
> > >
> > > Unlikely; at least, it hasn't happened in the last 3 or so years.
> >
> > There's no way for you to tell.
>
> ipchains -L -n
As I've demonstrated to you how someone with enough spare time could
cause large amounts of dynamically allocated IPs to be blocked by you
without any need for him to be associated with said IPs any longer,
this is meaningless.
> now talking of lobotomies... end of topic.
You misinterpreted me. I was talking about thought-resistance.
--
SIGSTOP
Reply to: