Re: fakebo vs nmap -sS (fwd)

To: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: fakebo vs nmap -sS (fwd)
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 22:14:36 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000404221436.G9594@mors.wiggy.net>
Mail-followup-to: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200004041023.LAA17302@copper.dcs.qmw.ac.uk>; from sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk on Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 11:23:49AM +0000
References: <[🔎] 200004041023.LAA17302@copper.dcs.qmw.ac.uk>

Previously Sergio Brandano wrote:
> I noted that fakebo does not report scans promoted using "nmap -sS".

Why should it?

Wichert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@liacs.nl                    http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Attachment: pgpgHBkfQe0em.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- fakebo vs nmap -sS (fwd)
  - From: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: fakebo vs nmap -sS (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: fakebo vs nmap -sS (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: fakebo vs nmap -sS (fwd)
Next by thread: a help required
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread