Re: GNOME security.

To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>
Cc: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>, debian-security@lists.debian.org, sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk
Subject: Re: GNOME security.
From: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 14:00:08 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 200003221400.OAA22310@copper.dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: Message from Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net> of "Wed, 22 Mar 2000 04:33:07 -0900." <[🔎] 20000322043307.F2677@plato.localdomain.local>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0003220123500.29661-100000@cornerstone.core.aoi> <[🔎] 20000322123633.E25188@mors.wiggy.net> <wichert@cistron.nl> <[🔎] 200003221324.NAA19938@copper.dcs.qmw.ac.uk> <[🔎] 20000322043307.F2677@plato.localdomain.local>

 Ethan Benson wrote:

>saft is controlled from /etc/inetd.conf at least it was when i somehow
>ended up with it.

 In order to kill saft I had to purge the sendfile package.

 Sergio

Reply to:

References:
- GNOME security.
  - From: Alexander Hvostov <vulture@aoi.dyndns.org>
- Re: GNOME security.
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Re: GNOME security.
  - From: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
- Re: GNOME security.
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>

Prev by Date: Re: GNOME security.
Next by Date: Re: GNOME security.
Previous by thread: Re: GNOME security.
Next by thread: Re: GNOME security.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread