[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fixed radare2 FTBFS (armel) – what to do about Git?



On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 00:29 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> Sven,
> 
> thanks for your input. I have done as you suggested: After verifying
> that the tags since 5.0.0 (combined with pristine-tar) match what is
> available via debsnap, I gbp-import-dsc'd all releases between
> 5.5.0+dfsg-1 and 5.9.8+dfsg-1  and applied my local patches.
> 
> Branches upstream, debian/master, and pristine-tar as well as tags have
> been pushed to Salsa; the original debian/master there has been
> preserved as debian/master-orig.
> 
> If anyone wants to check that I have not made things worse, go for it.

Checked and approved :-)

> At some point, I think that we should get rid of the old branches
> (debian/expeimental, debian/master-orig, master, meson, and probably
> pristine-lfs.)

I definitely second this.

And to comply with DEP-14, I suggest to rename debian/master to
debian/unstable [1].

> 
> Cheers,
> -Hilko
> 

Cheers,
Sven

[1] https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep14/, chapter 'Packaging
branches and tags', section 'For development releases', 2nd paragraph

-- 
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: