[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 6510-1] xdg-dbus-proxy security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-6510-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                           Alberto Garcia
September 23, 2026                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : xdg-dbus-proxy
CVE ID         : CVE-2026-94422
Debian Bug     : 1148782

It was discovered that an incorrect implementation of message
filtering in xdg-dbus-proxy allows an attacker to bypass the intended
message filtering on the D-Bus session bus by setting a reply serial
number on non-reply messages.

A malicious or compromised Flatpak app could achieve arbitrary code
execution outside its sandbox.

If other app frameworks rely on xdg-dbus-proxy in the same way that
Flatpak does, then they will have an equivalent vulnerability until
xdg-dbus-proxy is updated.

For the stable distribution (trixie), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.1.6-1+deb13u3.

We recommend that you upgrade your xdg-dbus-proxy packages.

For the detailed security status of xdg-dbus-proxy please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/xdg-dbus-proxy

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEYrwugQBKzlHMYFizAAyEYu0C2AIFAmqz9k8ACgkQAAyEYu0C
2ALgIQ/+PxT/gi1fq8su2pJAKGRqEFlUaR0UbC6Pg1L4nJfYm5ooLcUMMR0m2h5e
dMn92sWGr9/o3BDMb3fk4Ac6JROzI5/3M4No/r9wJl8HZEG6v+4YsR5ynhdQB3gX
Up6rFqyOK1dcOmSxx1CINZIQoM9mc/Hqv/jaY212GtlosFBkBkGR6fh63qpKQDpM
0SILyzu1EvPXcL0hpFgYMH7yMRZobGRPGpm+kcEgDz9HvlzsUeRZPQYK6+wdNScE
WZP+nzle9fkjVnV7F68yQNIq3JWiTv5SYR9T6Hk4JULd/z7K1Vu1XGEZE6vMZbXw
vSaisK3yAWeSp8YOHDuoLbY2ZjvhL3X/XwaRa1wrfvfHF7/ykObIxLEcj9upW8tK
Z3Qqb6fMkRYFe6XDq2XQXonq/9xtRvHN/wp9I/hf5Fvkzaa8EdEMUeTTJcj8gzHd
lHGNMqATfGVGHne9G4VJrV8Mh9ab1HQooDJSVXbfUGWQyU7kpjHV5tS4xpl7sNHz
yOMPkKkpiiR3ZGu5bV6IrYZrW+p49Hpr3c1rlyfuKHeyunLpNPAZTWoOBxKIJkge
6tBmlWdOGEi60nF9WW8F+txbmZaCEHlEtbB3rS1J0caY2MmaNeKdPXCD4XEbduDd
90c1C3gkze1gEqfmcpiIQCjIm9ZFToYb7Ku+VgjDtuz300Q8Vsk=
=WOSc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: