[SECURITY] [DSA 6433-1] xdg-dbus-proxy security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-6433-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
August 12, 2026 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : xdg-dbus-proxy
CVE ID : not yet available
It was discovered that incorrect validation of broadcast policy rules in
xdg-dbus-proxy (a filtering proxy for D-Bus connections) allowed a
malicious Flatpak application to monitor signals on the D-Bus session
bus.
For the stable distribution (trixie), this problem has been fixed in
version 0.1.6-1+deb13u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your xdg-dbus-proxy packages.
For the detailed security status of xdg-dbus-proxy please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/xdg-dbus-proxy
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=dXFK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: