[SECURITY] [DSA 6308-1] nagios4 security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-6308-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
May 28, 2026 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : nagios4
CVE ID : not yet available
Debian Bug : 1136340
It was discovered that some of the CGI scripts of the Nagios monitoring
system were susceptible to cross-site request forgery.
For the oldstable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed
in version 4.4.6-4+deb12u1.
For the stable distribution (trixie), this problem has been fixed in
version 4.4.6-4.1+deb13u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your nagios4 packages.
For the detailed security status of nagios4 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/nagios4
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=hhy2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: