[SECURITY] [DSA 6297-1] samba security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-6297-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
May 26, 2026 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : samba
CVE ID : CVE-2026-1933 CVE-2026-2340 CVE-2026-3012 CVE-2026-3238
CVE-2026-4408 CVE-2026-4480
Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in Samba, a SMB/CIFS file,
print, and login server for Unix, which might result in bypass of access
checks, overwrite of files in unintended situations using the WORM vfs
module, installing CA certificates over http without verification when
auto-enrollment GPO is enabled, denial of service or remote code
execution.
For the oldstable distribution (bookworm), these problems have been
fixed in version 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u4.
For the stable distribution (trixie), these problems have been fixed in
version 2:4.22.8+dfsg-0+deb13u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your samba packages.
For the detailed security status of samba please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/samba
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=7y5j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: