[SECURITY] [DSA 6224-1] xdg-dbus-proxy security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-6224-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
April 22, 2026 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : xdg-dbus-proxy
CVE ID : CVE-2026-34080
It was discovered that incorrect parsing of policy rules in the
xdg-dbus-proxy (a filtering proxy for D-Bus connections) allowed the
bypass of eavesdrop restrictions, which could result in information
disclosure.
For the oldstable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed
in version 0.1.4-3+deb12u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your xdg-dbus-proxy packages.
For the detailed security status of xdg-dbus-proxy please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/xdg-dbus-proxy
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=/R4P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: