[SECURITY] [DSA 6110-1] openjdk-17 security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-6110-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
January 25, 2026 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : openjdk-17
CVE ID : CVE-2026-21925 CVE-2026-21932 CVE-2026-21933
CVE-2026-21945
Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the OpenJDK Java
runtime, which may result in incorrect certificate validation,
CRLF injection or man-in-the-middle attacks.
For the oldstable distribution (bookworm), these problems have been fixed
in version 17.0.18+8-1~deb12u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your openjdk-17 packages.
For the detailed security status of openjdk-17 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openjdk-17
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=U4CN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: