[SECURITY] [DSA 5879-1] opensaml security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5879-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff
March 16, 2025 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : opensaml
CVE ID : not yet available
Alexander Tan discovered that the OpenSAML C++ library was susceptible
to forging of signed SAML messages. For additional details please refer
to the upstream advisory at
https://shibboleth.net/community/advisories/secadv_20250313.txt
For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 3.2.1-3+deb12u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your opensaml packages.
For the detailed security status of opensaml please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/opensaml
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=psIo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: