[SECURITY] [DSA 5749-1] flatpak security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-5749-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
August 14, 2024 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : flatpak
CVE ID : CVE-2024-42472
Chris Williams discovered a flaw in the handling of mounts for
persistent directories in Flatpak, an application deployment framework
for desktop apps. A malicious or compromised Flatpak app using
persistent directories could take advantage of this flaw to access files
outside of the sandbox.
Details can be found in the upstream advisory at
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/security/advisories/GHSA-7hgv-f2j8-xw87
For the stable distribution (bookworm), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.14.10-1~deb12u1. To address the vulnerability, flatpak uses a
new feature provided in bubblewrap and provided in version
0.8.0-2+deb12u1 along with this update.
We recommend that you upgrade your flatpak packages.
For the detailed security status of flatpak please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/flatpak
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=hd0W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: