[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4984-1] flatpak security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4984-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
October 12, 2021                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : flatpak
CVE ID         : CVE-2021-41133
Debian Bug     : 995935

It was discovered that sandbox restrictions in Flatpak, an application
deployment framework for desktop apps, could be bypassed for a Flatpak
app with direct access to AF_UNIX sockets, by manipulating the VFS using
mount-related syscalls that are not blocked by Flatpak's denylist
seccomp filter.

Details can be found in the upstream advisory at
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/security/advisories/GHSA-67h7-w3jq-vh4q

For the stable distribution (bullseye), this problem has been fixed in
version 1.10.5-0+deb11u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your flatpak packages.

For the detailed security status of flatpak please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/flatpak

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEERkRAmAjBceBVMd3uBUy48xNDz0QFAmFl+ylfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDQ2
NDQ0MDk4MDhDMTcxRTA1NTMxRERFRTA1NENCOEYzMTM0M0NGNDQACgkQBUy48xND
z0Qysg/9GSusDNb//c2YenjtD69MbupqsPif+PkKOxD1CUo2wWZReglxg28gBTy2
1WDhACY07FalwuOGbRAruWEJ5+Meb+ecQ8oI2VWtqIm7sTUaxWQ/CsKmwkviWZyh
jCWLr2ds7LSUISf5yl+HYzeAYGDCfdfdxDQ5BgcBXL7AiAMEmoDObi6dBk2QonVP
uF6ArVSm1uBgLYtsl2t1OjxzjXaaDIyGy6rA2RwO6AYAJU6+gZ6PQnf04gDz5kZ2
oj30TqBYTIgXM1TFdkJMNrxGbsGYW/mGYeFNYlZb3eBnNggTKyIlRKcr3OHDEjPf
MYELv2lN7UN4zU8qr5KmMqKYbmw5E2SZVpwtann3acWIk8TdasAZ3uLn+03qr4ke
T1ppk1unaH+V9JEXcyG1JIltgDZv7MmjF/xvlo8hLI9PRRtNu2Hb1RUQLVOiEB23
tNbYn2uJ3kRxQkWcBJMB64uEdihl+nt3VvwO8c03pNimC3NgLwEUiLzu3unwftxb
OYV2ypgoeLe27HBLvBJGS/uPQak9IH0OlNyGi7Rmstl/I2b983IfQJR+1Y5wRedx
Gl3JtjrEK7dCN87pLDjgb3gI9FV3bkyTHdO063by8V/Q4pqDk7xfBX1cS1iqrmhZ
tsABke2ApaxHGjyf7deztxVhTK6zwuznqPOtbAMi0bFF/fUMUmw=
=L6qM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: