[SECURITY] [DSA 4909-1] bind9 security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4909-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
May 01, 2021 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : bind9
CVE ID : CVE-2021-25214 CVE-2021-25215 CVE-2021-25216
Debian Bug : 987741 987742 987743
Several vulnerabilities were discovered in BIND, a DNS server
implementation.
CVE-2021-25214
Greg Kuechle discovered that a malformed incoming IXFR transfer
could trigger an assertion failure in named, resulting in denial
of service.
CVE-2021-25215
Siva Kakarla discovered that named could crash when a DNAME record
placed in the ANSWER section during DNAME chasing turned out to be
the final answer to a client query.
CVE-2021-25216
It was discovered that the SPNEGO implementation used by BIND is
prone to a buffer overflow vulnerability. This update switches to
use the SPNEGO implementation from the Kerberos libraries.
For the stable distribution (buster), these problems have been fixed in
version 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5.
We recommend that you upgrade your bind9 packages.
For the detailed security status of bind9 please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/bind9
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=H564
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: