[SECURITY] [DSA 4810-2] lxml regression update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4810-2 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
December 19, 2020 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : lxml
The update for lxml released as 4810-1 introduced a regression when
running under Python 2. Updated lxml packages are now available to
correct this issue.
For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
version 4.3.2-1+deb10u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your lxml packages.
For the detailed security status of lxml please refer to its security
tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/lxml
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=LWWp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: