[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DSA 4584-1] spamassassin security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4584-1                   security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
December 14, 2019                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : spamassassin
CVE ID         : CVE-2018-11805 CVE-2019-12420
Debian Bug     : 946652 946653

Two vulnerabilities were discovered in spamassassin, a Perl-based spam
filter using text analysis.

CVE-2018-11805

    Malicious rule or configuration files, possibly downloaded from an
    updates server, could execute arbitrary commands under multiple
    scenarios.

CVE-2019-12420

    Specially crafted mulitpart messages can cause spamassassin to use
    excessive resources, resulting in a denial of service.

For the oldstable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
in version 3.4.2-1~deb9u2.

For the stable distribution (buster), these problems have been fixed in
version 3.4.2-1+deb10u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your spamassassin packages.

For the detailed security status of spamassassin please refer to its
security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/spamassassin

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/

Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=1VBK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: