[SECURITY] [DSA 4405-1] openjpeg2 security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4405-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Luciano Bello
March 10, 2019 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : openjpeg2
CVE ID : CVE-2017-17480 CVE-2018-5785 CVE-2018-6616 CVE-2018-14423
CVE-2018-18088
Debian Bug : 884738 888533 889683 904873 910763
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in openjpeg2, the
open-source JPEG 2000 codec, that could be leveraged to cause a denial
of service or possibly remote code execution.
CVE-2017-17480
Write stack buffer overflow in the jp3d and jpwl codecs can result
in a denial of service or remote code execution via a crafted jp3d
or jpwl file.
CVE-2018-5785
Integer overflow can result in a denial of service via a crafted bmp
file.
CVE-2018-6616
Excessive iteration can result in a denial of service via a crafted
bmp file.
CVE-2018-14423
Division-by-zero vulnerabilities can result in a denial of service via
a crafted j2k file.
CVE-2018-18088
Null pointer dereference can result in a denial of service via a
crafted bmp file.
For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
version 2.1.2-1.1+deb9u3.
We recommend that you upgrade your openjpeg2 packages.
For the detailed security status of openjpeg2 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/openjpeg2
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=CJHO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: