[SECURITY] [DSA 4357-1] libapache-mod-jk security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-4357-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
December 20, 2018 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : libapache-mod-jk
CVE ID : CVE-2018-11759
Raphael Arrouas and Jean Lejeune discovered an access control bypass
vulnerability in mod_jk, the Apache connector for the Tomcat Java
servlet engine. The vulnerability is addressed by upgrading mod_jk to
the new upstream version 1.2.46, which includes additional changes.
https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html#Changes_between_1.2.42_and_1.2.43
https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html#Changes_between_1.2.43_and_1.2.44
https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html#Changes_between_1.2.44_and_1.2.45
https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html#Changes_between_1.2.45_and_1.2.46
For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
version 1:1.2.46-0+deb9u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your libapache-mod-jk packages.
For the detailed security status of libapache-mod-jk please refer to its
security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/libapache-mod-jk
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEERkRAmAjBceBVMd3uBUy48xNDz0QFAlwcFXJfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDQ2
NDQ0MDk4MDhDMTcxRTA1NTMxRERFRTA1NENCOEYzMTM0M0NGNDQACgkQBUy48xND
z0Qu7Q/6A6UGJsGJox6vlwjOso6/n0kSUW+Q/ojIL5O3BkDgxY4SkZ0Aw3OBWuj4
b4WimxndglxjA2/Lx5NPzthA82kSSYVJWkngjlhRCIX1eqFadpHrkXVPb1pBxvQ5
/JJsArO0X01qQQPlqsjSHtWQVDlRsELwycb48B+3u7Si9LUiyg5Z2kaBSanWvYNw
zDwludKjJpvMg8XoqR1dvrycXPK5NDkfqAud22cquog8XCNpc/jDNPMFLHwXQp1H
JJgLpIIJncHB9CPbi+7rMYpNsRBnAQNEcz6LGjsWY7fkgSfJfx/P8ezYjliDY7xf
EzxFDNXj+LHs1xH/7cTkf5+EX+rjU8lonPEAxqXpsZ9OKqGZfUBUAM7dyUWoMAMI
W0EB1Hr3ysa69V5EjGMdp2djH56OcMAAYB/uHu+R0p4YrE0Ivkx5XfUglnYLa9Wa
X9+jVf5Unp4qRNuCVwaI2k9P2u60UZezYx6hjMG81nxkZLDg6CAzDcVqGYR+dS4D
Z8wY0ya6NOMwnrkhuJfTX1LONbkwgzvNh/EvAZNduy6r8x62Sff7PVtaRWf2LjXq
sjjs9IT9Tc7Ta96GcR/nXkLc+VVdefvf2hZ29BDhEWovYhnb9X4k8Wsd2e/x4NFW
uz4nNmazB9Yyj1QD3G5DN7tfIoJ+iSuqIWtJqLIiOY7/VO+scPs=
=CyjI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: