[SECURITY] [DSA 3696-1] linux security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3696-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
October 19, 2016 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : linux
CVE ID : CVE-2015-8956 CVE-2016-5195 CVE-2016-7042 CVE-2016-7425
Debian Bug : 831014
Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Linux kernel that
may lead to a privilege escalation, denial of service or information
leaks.
CVE-2015-8956
It was discovered that missing input sanitising in RFCOMM Bluetooth
socket handling may result in denial of service or information leak.
CVE-2016-5195
It was discovered that a race condition in the memory management
code can be used for local privilege escalation.
CVE-2016-7042
Ondrej Kozina discovered that incorrect buffer allocation in the
proc_keys_show() function may result in local denial of service.
CVE-2016-7425
Marco Grassi discovered a buffer overflow in the arcmsr SCSI driver
which may result in local denial of service, or potentially,
arbitrary code execution.
Additionally this update fixes a regression introduced in DSA-3616-1
causing iptables performance issues (cf. Debian Bug #831014).
For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 3.16.36-1+deb8u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your linux packages.
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=cKgt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: