[SECURITY] [DSA 3399-1] libpng security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian Security Advisory DSA-3399-1 security@debian.org
https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso
November 18, 2015 https://www.debian.org/security/faq
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : libpng
CVE ID : CVE-2015-7981 CVE-2015-8126
Debian Bug : 803078 805113
Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the libpng PNG library.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the
following problems:
CVE-2015-7981
Qixue Xiao discovered an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the
png_convert_to_rfc1123 function. A remote attacker can potentially
take advantage of this flaw to cause disclosure of information from
process memory.
CVE-2015-8126
Multiple buffer overflows were discovered in the png_set_PLTE and
png_get_PLTE functions. A remote attacker can take advantage of this
flaw to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a small
bit-depth value in an IHDR (image header) chunk in a PNG image.
For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
in version 1.2.49-1+deb7u1.
For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.2.50-2+deb8u1.
For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
version 1.2.54-1.
We recommend that you upgrade your libpng packages.
Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWTNedAAoJEAVMuPMTQ89EkiEP/1ExmsLSf0JdkMmw09f4tr78
85My7CQaskhSEzVSiVb31fA1hSpK2hEwC6LplmvjS+hYdBxxfR2Yuq4S5RM1UcBE
rk20ymA1ewr29svXYU5DPuCfKPOMU882+bezwDbpE4RF3XKfAf+krs+qEtgm5c3S
ch8Q7zRHZuv06QjWDtyumOY7DSZjA0XaorXIrFhJT3WsHLuO2hD2ON7RT2hzi7DQ
ub5bfJA3S7pErJLTQl21e9FFrY0FG+X6qxp/zBFGrWGuoTvfuNhXt42rFB1/t2xs
gVQdCd6Sfr1JXmDgKpQrMfwXkQ8pilBHuQvZTG9tasgsdZX65ntsk6ku53n0AJfj
ijnMmuHNP1vGTVxZk6lYTp7IETQS9so4QmIpc4fP94vG7YCNNBlL75PQumeyqHYZ
l8VFEvYeC68+bPJNE4tRCMSIo7IuGCeAXl7faP/MFMCR0g9mI6Rxee1yFRPlaIVb
ZkHMtXP3jOyOb9dyuZEALY+27qcqvLC+w++sYtViVXRf9zIU55c297xxD9wX+DFz
EksYLB8aJA2seQGJjL/1rqJspL/rA4GwzvueJygXEQFHdkM/QQqZUGLUwtrnys2O
ejeP7wRcrnzyP90fZ36lE4SjZR1K2zNYDCrUYGEXeuONJ2QD5oORiBlTGIrp3JBu
WFAWbRxTLdH7U2Re3i6/
=Ih0s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: