Re: scikit-learn testing migration
- To: Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
- Cc: 1003165@bugs.debian.org, 1008369@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: scikit-learn testing migration
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:25:42 +0200
- Message-id: <YuusttwNDAlN2/Rd@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <YuNddpRANKFWnvFF@an3as.eu>
- References: <32951d554eb1018b453dacb0630ee19f28613f39.camel@gmail.com> <Ytfk7vzFaqWaNEBR@an3as.eu> <7a65d5c8-fda2-7fe1-e019-a774b9c6e722@debian.org> <YthWMB8pVSio6ozi@an3as.eu> <YuDvv0GCo0CAc2U7@an3as.eu> <f8c903a0e7bfb36ba830d7936ff02cc53e25aa2e.camel@riseup.net> <CAM8zJQtKjmsPs4=TXHDaXrJA_0M_7i48AefNjTHRWhZoixTnJw@mail.gmail.com> <YuJFunirPqxyHD26@an3as.eu> <3d57793c71a185b5424c0b868a0c3f2554c8b86f.camel@riseup.net> <YuNddpRANKFWnvFF@an3as.eu>
Hi again,
Am Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 06:09:26AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> I just like to repeat my point: If the package is to slow on release
> architectures, that we will not manage to fix it, it is in the interest
> of our users to not support the problematic architectures in favour of
> providing it for the architetures where the package is used in practice.
>
> I have perfectly understood that we will loose several packages on that
> architectures and that this is not a good step. But having those
> packages not at all is eve worse.
Before we fall into another "do nothing" period: I will upload
scikit-learn restricted to those architectures only which have all tests
passing and will ask ftpmaster for removal of the others. If you think
this is a bad idea please give good reasons not to do so or even better
fix the package for the problematic architectures.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: