Re: Removal requests submitted for CERNLIB packages
Le samedi 5 mars 2011 02:57:31, Lifeng Sun a écrit :
> Hi Kevin,
>
> The FTBFS bug of CERNLIB is actually an issue of diffutils, when I
> built it after squeeze released last month, the bug disappeared, so I
> think this bug could be closed now.
>
> I would like to adopt the CERNLIB-related packages if allowed.
I could help also,
>
>
> BTW: I am preparing to package ROOT.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Lifeng
>
> On 16:14 Fri 03/04/11 Mar , Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > Hello debian-science,
> >
> > In my capacity (such as it is) as the ex-maintainer of CERNLIB-related
> > packages, I want to supply one final courtesy notice to the list
> > regarding CERNLIB, specifically, that I have submitted removal
> > requests for cernlib, paw, mclibs and geant321 source packages in Sid.
> >
> > Please see [1]. They have already been removed from testing, and so
> >
> > were not released with Squeeze [2].
> >
> > This is basically the absolute last chance for anyone to breathe new
> > life into these packages. Personally though, I'd advise against it
> > [3].
> >
> > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508413#22
> > [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-wnpp/2010/09/msg00038.html
> > [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/09/msg00028.html
> >
> > Apologies for the intrusion onto the list.
> >
> > best regards,
Reply to: