Re: Summary of Debian Science BOF at DebConf

[Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>]

On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:21:22PM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> My initial draft is ready:
> 
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/ProblemsToWorkOn/DebTags

Thanks.  I added a link to the DebianScience/ProblemsToWorkOn page.
 
Here are my comments:

  - I really like this page and hope it helps enhancing the DebTags for science
    packages
  - Paragraph "4. Enhance Task Pages": TBD (volunteers)?
    Volunteers are very welcome to join my Python coding.  Some suggestions in
    how far the enhancement should be done are helpful as well.
  - Paragraph "5. Keeping Task Pages Up-to-date"
    The tasks pages are updated once a day - so what do you exactly mean?
  - Representation of Debian Science Tasks:
    Paragraph "Proposal #1"
    I agree from a DebTaggers point of view.  It seems like a clean and and
    logical approach.  However, matching to our current tasks seems a bit
    tricky because sometimes a task is mapped to a field (mapping with devel
    facet would be doable of course vor the devel packages).  But sometimes
    we need to look into use:: and works-with:: fields.  I currently do not
    have a good idea how to map this consistently.  (This is no argument
    against your tagging, I just have no proper solution for the tasks.)
  - I like the data:: facet suggestion

Thanks for your work on this

       Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de