Really cool responses! (Was: Summary of Debian Science BOF at DebConf)
Hi,
well, I would have loved really cool responses to the summary and todo
list of the Debian Science Workshop. Did we completely lost momentum
after DebConf or is just everybody busy fixing RC bugs for a soon
Squeeze release???
The only result of my mails was an edit from Yaroslav who clarified
the BibTeX suggestion. Anything else?
Kind regards
Andreas.
----- Forwarded message from Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> -----
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:32:06 +0200
From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
To: Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Summary of Debian Science BOF at DebConf (Was: Summary of Debian
Med BOF at Debconf)
Hi,
sorry for the confusion and thanks to Michael for pointing at it. Yes,
there was no Debian Med BOF at DebConf and I was addressing Debian
Science Roundtable (as well as other Debian Science related events
at DebConf I was watching via live stream.
Please have alook at
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/ProblemsToWorkOn
and add your thoughts / fix things I might have expressed incorrectly.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:37:28PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:10:21PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > even if I missed DebConf personally I joined the BOF thanks to the
> > great video team. I took the time to summarise the main problems
> > which were discussed in the BOF from my perspective. There are
> > good chances that I missed something and so I would like to ask
> > the participiants to look at
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/ProblemsToWorkOn
> >
> > and check whether it fits your personal view. We then should discuss
> > the problems mentioned there to find the best of the suggested solutions
> > and implement it.
>
> Oops, this is a summary of the science round-table, right? I just
> looked at the subject and almost skipped it.
>
> Will take a look now.
>
>
> Michael
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: