Re: Two small packages, or repackaging upstream sources ?

To: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-science@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Two small packages, or repackaging upstream sources ?
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 22:24:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605032222420.4320@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <20060503182105.GA31820@kunpuu.plessy.org>
References: <20060503182105.GA31820@kunpuu.plessy.org>

On Thu, 4 May 2006, Charles Plessy wrote:

If I understand correctly, repackaging upstream sources is strongly
discouraged.


Ups? Any link that supports your assumption.
IMHO, repackaging upstream tarball is a reasonable thing to do
here.

Kind regards

          Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

References:
- Two small packages, or repackaging upstream sources ?
  - From: Charles Plessy <charles-debian-nospam@plessy.org>

Prev by Date: Two small packages, or repackaging upstream sources ?
Next by Date: Debian Bug#366321: ITP: amap-align -- Protein multiple alignment by sequence annealing
Previous by thread: Two small packages, or repackaging upstream sources ?
Next by thread: Debian Bug#366321: ITP: amap-align -- Protein multiple alignment by sequence annealing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread