On Saturday 28 July 2001 12:13, Gerhard Tonn wrote: > > Sorry, but that's not true. c 5 1 is correct and works fine with kernel > 2.4. The problem is with 2.2 only and should be fixed in the kernel. > Anyhow, since we are targetting for a 2.4 based woody for s390, everything > is fine. > By the way, that _is_ fixed in the latest 2.2 kernel patches at developer works. Regards, Gerhard