Re: Хочу найти старый пакет из experimental.
On 2015-12-18, yrii2121 wrote:
>> 42.0 нужен т.к. в 38.0 Wbem + MSE не работает.
> Если так надо, то вот:
> http://snapshot.debian.org/package/iceweasel/42.0-1/#iceweasel_42.0-1
Спасибо!
Еще не хватает цифровой подписи. В
https://packages.qa.debian.org/i/iceweasel.html
есть ссылка на подписаное письмо:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/i/iceweasel/news/20151104T070026Z.html
Я проверил содержимое письма:
bash# gpg --verify x.mail
gpg: Signature made 2015-11-04T08:33:41 EET
gpg: using RSA key E42AA04FA6AA8C72
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
bash# gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys E42AA04FA6AA8C72
gpg: requesting key E42AA04FA6AA8C72 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
gpg: key E42AA04FA6AA8C72: public key "Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>" imported
gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
gpg: depth: 0 valid: 2 signed: 1 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 2u
gpg: depth: 1 valid: 1 signed: 0 trust: 1-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2016-03-07
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1)
bash# gpg --verify x.mail
gpg: Signature made 2015-11-04T08:33:41 EET
gpg: using RSA key E42AA04FA6AA8C72
gpg: Good signature from "Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>"
gpg: aka "Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>"
gpg: aka "Mike Hommey <glandium@mozilla.com>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 182E 161D 1130 B9FC CD7D B167 E42A A04F A6AA 8C72
и в письме такой же как у deb пакета:
bash# wget http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20151104T093935Z/pool/main/i/iceweasel/iceweasel_42.0-1_amd64.deb
bash# md5sum iceweasel_42.0-1_amd64.deb
3d3eed4ae3aefd3abafd103ab821b93e iceweasel_42.0-1_amd64.deb
bash# grep 3d3eed4ae3aefd3abafd103ab821b93e x.mail
679: 3d3eed4ae3aefd3abafd103ab821b93e 40905068 web optional iceweasel_42.0-1_amd64.deb
Как находить подпись пакета?
В http://snapshot.debian.org/ я не вижу подписей?
--
Best regards!
Reply to: