Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools

On 06/01/2012 11:23 PM, Mikhail A Antonov wrote:

17: eth0.103@eth0:<BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>  mtu 1500 qdisc
noqueue state UP


Наивно полагать, что 103 это id.

--
sergio.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: sergio <mailbox@sergio.spb.ru>

References:
- iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: "Dmitry A. Zhiglov" <dmitry.zhiglov@gmail.com>
- Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
- Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: Artem Chuprina <ran@ran.pp.ru>
- Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
- Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: sergio <mailbox@sergio.spb.ru>
- Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: Eugene Berdnikov <bd4@protva.ru>
- Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: sergio <mailbox@sergio.spb.ru>
- Re: iproute2 vs. legacy tools
  - From: Mikhail A Antonov <bart@solarnet.ru>