[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-2



On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Paul van Tilburg <paulvt@debian.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
>> I have updated ruby-lockfile. It builds fine with pbuilder and
>> is lintian clean.
>>
>> Changes since last upload:
>>
>> ruby-lockfile (2.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>>   * Correct binary ruby versions tag.
>>   * Relax conflicts with transitional package to breaks.
>>   * Escape hyphens used in rlock.1 man page.
>>
>>  -- Per Andersson <avtobiff@gmail.com>  Fri, 08 Jun 2012 23:41:57 +0200
>>
>> Please review and upload. Thanks in advance!
>
> Package seems fine, but there are a few (pedantic mode) lintian things
> (which I don't always agree with, but with these I do):
>
> I: ruby-lockfile source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "priority" in package liblockfile-ruby
> I: ruby-lockfile source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
> I: ruby-lockfile: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
>
> Also ruby-lockfile should be in section "ruby".

All fixed and pushed for both ruby-lockfile and ruby-trollop.


--
Per

> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> --
> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux  | E-mail: paulvt@debian.org
> Jabber/GTalk: paul@luon.net          | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20120619195910.GG1728@luon.net">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20120619195910.GG1728@luon.net
>


Reply to: