Re: RFS: ruby-lockfile 2.1.0-2
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 09:59:10PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> > I have updated ruby-lockfile. It builds fine with pbuilder and
> > is lintian clean.
> >
> > Changes since last upload:
> >
> > ruby-lockfile (2.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> > * Correct binary ruby versions tag.
> > * Relax conflicts with transitional package to breaks.
> > * Escape hyphens used in rlock.1 man page.
> >
> > -- Per Andersson <avtobiff@gmail.com> Fri, 08 Jun 2012 23:41:57 +0200
> >
> > Please review and upload. Thanks in advance!
>
> Package seems fine, but there are a few (pedantic mode) lintian things
> (which I don't always agree with, but with these I do):
>
> I: ruby-lockfile source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "priority" in package liblockfile-ruby
Ok, I actually don't care about this, but alright. ruby-trollop has the
same issue though.
> I: ruby-lockfile source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
This issue also occurs in ruby-trollop. Please add a watch file.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: paulvt@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: paul@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
Reply to: