[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: ruby-mocha



On 06/04/11 at 12:15 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
> > On 04/04/11 at 10:34 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
> > > > > We still need to update the tracking UDD scripts to ignore the
> > > > > transitional packages in migrated packages.
> > > > 
> > > > I'll do that when the packages are accepted, so there's a way to test
> > > > that it works.
> > > 
> > > Great.
> > > 
> > > What do you think of centralizing all this transition tracking code on
> > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/wheezy-transition-tracker.git;a=summary
> > > ?
> > 
> > The script is a cgi, so it needs to live in cgi-bin. How do you think
> > that we should manage it?
> >
> > In the meantime, it's available as:
> > alioth:/srv/home/groups/pkg-ruby-extras/cgi-bin/wheezy-transition.cgi
> > (group writable) or
> > http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/wheezy-transition.cgi
> 
> Thanks for sharing. :)
> 
> What I thought was to get the script's logic and make the whole thing
> not depend on external CGI scripts, generating static files instead.
> 
> I've just updated the repository with this and updated the published
> copy:
> 
> http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/wheezy/

Nice. i've made a few changes (pushed). Could you update the live copy?
I also wanted to list the packages in NEW that are about ruby, but the
NEW UDD importer is currently broken. I've asked Andreas Tille to fix
it.

- Lucas


Reply to: