Re: Bug#1050974: binNMU: Rebuild against curl without NSS support
On 2023-09-03 17:44:14 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2023-09-02 19:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > On top of that, those two packages have already been rebuilt for
> > > riscv64 (no binNMUs required there), whereas if we force another
> > > upload only to solve this, we will trigger a build for every arch and
> > > needlessly consume at the very least 77 hours of the riscv builders'
> > > time (while we are still rebuilding the archive for riscv, delaying it
> > > all).
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-14&arch=riscv64
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-15&arch=riscv64
> > >
> > > Do you think that's a sensible compromise?
> > > I'm asking to proceed with binNMUs because eg25-manager has been fixed
> > > in git already and the llvm packages are about to be removed (although
> > > I want curl to migrate before that), also rebuilding them on riscv
> > > takes a lot of effort at a not-so-great time (no binNMUs required for
> > > riscv).
> >
> > Please get those uploaded instead. We will rebuild
> > llvm-toolchain-{14,15} a bunch of times for transitions anyway. If
> > riscv64 buildds are not ready to cope with that, the architecture is not
> > ready to become a release architecture.
>
> Please note that avoiding an upload on riscv64 is NOT a request from the
> riscv64 porters. Despite the long building time, we believe that the
> build daemons will be able to handle a rebuild of those packages. In
> addition 2 more buildds are being prepared.
ACK, closing those binNMU requests.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: