coreutils_9.1-1_riscv64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 11:27:27 -0400
Source: coreutils
Binary: coreutils coreutils-dbgsym
Architecture: riscv64
Version: 9.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Description:
coreutils - GNU core utilities
Closes: 982300 983565 991378 1012665 1017110 1017354
Changes:
coreutils (9.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version (Closes: #1017354)
- Corrects printf single quote behavior (Closes: #1017110)
- Works around broken fuse.portal (Closes: #991378)
- split --number=K/N fixed (Closes: #982300)
- Supersedes restore-ls-behavior patch
* Use DPKG_ROOT in postinst/postrm (Closes: #983565)
* Update debhelper compat to 13
* Update copyright file (Closes: #1012665)
* remove old kfbsd patches 85 (timer_settime) and 99 (fstat)
Checksums-Sha1:
61d9f907024d7cb1decd5e38c4b6fbe7e0a16b98 6200060 coreutils-dbgsym_9.1-1_riscv64.deb
3af0abf1e9cdcb5c55c8d28669a38a59ce9a084e 6891 coreutils_9.1-1_riscv64.buildinfo
33b04a5f4c52413e7c1d952b24fb71b8274e5895 2851108 coreutils_9.1-1_riscv64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ee8a05ec8d4b1b3e171def4ad2beccfa756ab6b5e42a72fc1aec89df95dc02d6 6200060 coreutils-dbgsym_9.1-1_riscv64.deb
773000a397be8b2de17624f0f0cdcaa9c0ee1d50d96e7715cf6a70c7b37d95db 6891 coreutils_9.1-1_riscv64.buildinfo
9b9ebc9fa4ad7dd8e61942d6790b2abd641972ffe33d125bfbd8d4f61fe50dde 2851108 coreutils_9.1-1_riscv64.deb
Files:
d41cdc5509b622d40cce8251bbbbe46f 6200060 debug optional coreutils-dbgsym_9.1-1_riscv64.deb
b0d0ca24ee47289cee50eacfbd92e19f 6891 utils required coreutils_9.1-1_riscv64.buildinfo
16c1090d0fd6ad474fecaa16daaaee01 2851108 utils required coreutils_9.1-1_riscv64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=rwMT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: