[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)



Hi,

Am 4. Juli 2023 13:29:48 MESZ schrieb Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>:
>On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 09:31:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 25.06.23 um 13:37 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
>> > > what about the
>> > > following:
>> > > - make all test failures fatal on a*64 (since upstream tests these), and
>> > > - make smoketest failures fatal on all architectures (including ports)
>>
>> That was implemented (+ two more important tests) in experimental. See
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libreoffice
>>
>> It does
>> - bridgetest
>> - smoketest
>> - pyuno
>>
>> What fails for release archs astonishingly is only mips(64)el.
>
>It also failed on riscv64

riscv64 as of now tests everything, see the comment in rules. It doesn't get the "already exists as release arch and keep it" bonus (yet).

testtools and pyuno work but indeed, smoketest fails as it does for mips64el.

> (and powerpc), so that seems to be
>a criteria that catches the known-broken builds.

Yup

>>...
>> This test extension to be installed is a Java extension.
>> So I am running a nojava build on eller now... I don't really like disabling
>> Java since this opens Pandoras box but for mips64el we probably could do
>> that.
>
>It would also hint at a MIPS problem in LibreOffice,

Yeah, we at least know the 32bit (mipsel) is (and probably was for ages) completely broken.

>which might or might not be specific to Java.

Yeah, just that it exhibits with a java extension. Probably should try with a dummy or a python one.

>AFAIK OpenJDK on MIPS does not have any known major issues.

Mmh

>The Zero build of OpenJDK on MIPS is of course slow,
>but that's also true on armel where the build succeeded.

Indeed.

>BTW: The MIPS-specific discussion should continue on debian-mips instead
>     of debian-ports.

What I also said already :)

Regards

René

Reply to: