On 2023-04-25, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 23:20:01 +0800, Bo YU wrote: >> Currently riscv32 has been supported upstream for a while[0] and people >> can setup a riscv32 qemu with yocto[1], but it is time consuming. >> There is no distro to support riscv32 AFAIK until now however I think >> this will benefits users who want to setup riscv32 rootfs quickly if we >> support this. ... > I think at the time when we added riscv64 we didn't also add riscv32 > because it was not clear whether there was then interest or demand, > and I don't recall whether there were concerns about what ISA baseline > to choose? (But I guess this would use the default baseline specified > currently by the compiler.) FWIW, when I gave a short talk about Debian's riscv64 port a few years ago almost all the questions from the audience basically came down to "when are you going to do a riscv32 port?" ... I suspect it was at least partly because it is much easier to implement a riscv32 core in FPGA that riscv64. So there is *some* interest, even if a bit niche, though the landscape maybe has changed a bit since 2019 with more riscv64 silicon available? live well, vagrant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature