Hi! El 08/08/22 a las 12:47, Vagrant Cascadian escribió: > On 2022-06-04, Bo YU wrote: > > * Big thanks to debci team and PLCT > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > ** With continued help from the debci team, Debian has a basic debci service[0] > > run on riscv64 machines that are sponsored by PLCT[1]. This is a scenario > > that must be satisfied if RISC-V becomes the release arch. Sure, > > The RISC-V on Debian is still an unofficial port now and there is more work > > to be done. > > I've recently been experimenting with salsa-ci for various packages, and > it would be great to add a riscv64 build for u-boot: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/u-boot/-/pipelines/408729 > > It can in theory crossbuild for arm64, armhf and armel, but riscv64 is a > little trickier since it is not yet a release architecture, and I > haven't yet figured out how to configure it to allow debian-ports... > > > I wonder what it would take to get some native riscv64 runners set up > for salsa-ci: > > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline As of today, and gitlab runner 15.2: "GitLab Runner officially supported binaries are available for the following architectures: x86, AMD64, ARM64, ARM, s390x, ppc64le": https://docs.gitlab.com/15.2/runner/install/ For the record, there is already a filed issue requesting riscv64 support: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-runner/-/issues/27562 > > I haven't looked into it, but you can "bring your own" arm64 and armhf > runners currently. > Indeed. If you have your own runner, you can enable ARM builds. > > live well, > vagrant Cheers, -- Santiago
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature