Bug#1121291: reportbug: When launching reportbug from the console; there seems to be a missing dep "gir1.2" when prompted to use the GTK version
Package: reportbug
Version: 13.2.0
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: arcademan20@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
When launching reportbug from the console; there seems to be a missing dependancy "gir1.2-vte-2.91" when prompted to use the GTK+ version.
The reportbug feature drops to a console window just fine after trying to launch the GTK+ version.
Exact Message:
"Please install the gir1.2-vte-2.91 package to use the GTK+ (known as 'gtk' in reportbug) interface."
"Falling back to 'text' interface.
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
INTERFACE=gtk
** /home/a/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "13.2.0"
mode standard
ui gtk
email "arcademan20@gmail.com"
no-cc
list-cc-me
smtphost reportbug.debian.org
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 13.2
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.12.57+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 3.0.3
ii python3 3.13.5-1
ii python3-reportbug 13.2.0
ii sensible-utils 0.0.25
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn claws-mail <none>
ii debconf 1.5.91
pn debsums <none>
pn default-mta | postfix | exim4 | mail-transport-agent <none>
pn dlocate <none>
pn emacs-bin-common <none>
ii file 1:5.46-5
ii gnupg 2.4.7-21
pn python3-urwid <none>
pn reportbug-gtk <none>
ii xdg-utils 1.2.1-2
Versions of packages python3-reportbug depends on:
ii apt 3.0.3
ii file 1:5.46-5
ii python3 3.13.5-1
ii python3-apt 3.0.0
ii python3-debian 1.0.1
ii python3-debianbts 4.1.1
ii python3-requests 2.32.3+dfsg-5
ii sensible-utils 0.0.25
python3-reportbug suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: