Bug#932524: reportbug: support buster-pu bugs against release.debian.org
Package: reportbug
Version: 7.5.2
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainers,
I just noticed that, when submitting a bug against release.debian.org,
reportbug offers an option for stretch-pu, but not buster-pu.
Please consider updating the template used there (or programatically generate
it based on the list of current Debian releases).
Best,
nicoo
- -- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="emacsclient"
PAGER="less"
DEBEMAIL="nicoo@debian.org"
DEBFULLNAME="Nicolas Braud-Santoni"
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/nicoo/.reportbugrc:
mode advanced
ui text
sign gpg
no-query-bts
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 1.8.2
ii python3 3.7.3-1
ii python3-reportbug 7.5.2
ii sensible-utils 0.0.12
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn claws-mail <none>
ii debconf-utils 1.5.72
ii debsums 2.2.3
pn dlocate <none>
pn emacs24-bin-common | emacs25-bin-common <none>
ii file 1:5.35-4
ii gnupg 2.2.13-2
ii msmtp-mta [mail-transport-agent] 1.8.3-1
pn python3-urwid <none>
pn reportbug-gtk <none>
ii xdg-utils 1.1.3-1
Versions of packages python3-reportbug depends on:
ii apt 1.8.2
ii file 1:5.35-4
ii python3 3.7.3-1
ii python3-apt 1.8.4
ii python3-debian 0.1.35
ii python3-debianbts 2.8.2
ii python3-requests 2.21.0-1
python3-reportbug suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Y8xj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: