Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Adam, On Sat, 06 Dec 2025 16:41:00 +0000 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Mon, 2025-11-17 at 15:43 +0100, Daniel Gr=C3=B6ber wrote: > > [ Reason ] > > clatd is currently completely non-functional in Trixie. A packaging > > bug I did't get around to in time "systemd units not getting > > installed" #1101004 made using it a manual affair. Now I've found > > #1082060 in tayga actually breaks it completely. > > -+ install -D -m0644 scripts/*.service $(SYSTEMD_SYSSERVICEDIR)/ > ++ install -D -m0644 scripts/clatd.systemd $(SYSTEMD_SYSSERVICEDIR)/clatd.s= > ervice > ++ #install -D -m0644 scripts/clatd@.systemd $(SYSTEMD_SYSSERVICEDIR)/clatd= > @.service > > Why is a commented line for a template service added? Surely it should eith= > er be installed or not mentioned at all? I was working on this and the unstable branch in parallel and hadn't quite settled on whether the per-interface daemon would work out so I left it there as a note for later, well for now I suppose :-). It turned out I cannot enable this in stable without bringing in another patch "Read [both] global and interface specific config file" https://salsa.debian.org/debian/clatd/-/commit/ac1c4e16bdf7553ed89810774cc70c414480a0ec This one didn't seem suitable for a s-u however so I added it only to the unstable upload. To be clear: *Not* installing clatd@.service is intentional. It is still mentioned in clatd.conf in my p-u which is a bit inconsistent: > # /etc/clatd/INTERFACE.conf: per-interface settings (clatd@INTERFACE.service) I would actually mildly prefer leaving it that way to avoid a conffile prompt on upgrade from Trixie -> Forky. What do you think? Thanks, --Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature