Re: openjdk-8 vs. nvidia-openjdk-8-jre
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:43:11AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>...
> And having openjdk-8-* installed manually should not satisfy the openjdk
> (build) dependency of any package in the archive via virtual packages.
We already have two OpenJDK version (17 and 21) in bookworm.
Everything should be fine if:
- default-jre* is always the first alternative in the dependencies, and
- everything requiring > 8 depends on a java*-runtime* >= java9-runtime*
I'm not expecting these things to be 100% bug-free, but such things
would already blow up today when someone still has a JRE from an older
release installed (e.g. I was for some time using the security-supported
openjdk-8/stretch on buster for a usecase where OpenJDK 11 did not work).
> Andreas
cu
Adrian
Reply to: