[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1031592: unblock: poke/3.0+dfsg



Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On 2023-02-18 19:03:17 -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I decided to file this request even though this is *not* going to
> involve any transition nor anything big.  Please let me know if you
> prefer to be contacted via other channels.
> 
> [ Reason ]
> 
> poke has recently released version 3.0.  Unfortunately, due to personal
> reasons, I was unable to work on updating our package until this
> weekend.  I believe it is in the best interest of our users to have poke
> 3.0 shipped in bookworm, not only because of the several bugs that are
> being fixed, but also because other GNU/Linux distributions are already
> shipping the latest version to their users.
> 
> [ Impact ]
> 
> Shipping the current version of poke in testing (2.4) will make the
> bookworm release already outdated when compared to other distributions.

Note that there is no automatic blocking of new upstream releases. From
https://release.debian.org/bookworm/freeze_policy.html

"Starting 2023-02-12, only small, targeted fixes are appropriate for
bookworm. We want maintainers to focus on small, targeted fixes. This is
mainly at the maintainers discretion, there will be no hard rule that
will be enforced."

In any case, if you want us to judge if the update to 3.0 would be
acceptable under this rule, we need more info. What's new in the
release? Is this a small update or a major update? etc.

Cheers

> 
> [ Risks ]
> 
> poke is not a key package.  Nothing reverse-depends on it.  If we
> encounter any problems with poke, it will not affect any essential part
> of the system.
> 
> [ Other Info ]
> 
> I've uploaded poke 3.0 to experimental.  You can confirm that the
> package successfully builds:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=poke&suite=experimental
> 
> 
> 
> Please let me know if you need more information to proceed with this
> request.
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> 
> -- 
> Sergio
> GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
> Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
> https://sergiodj.net/



-- 
Sebastian Ramacher


Reply to: