Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
On 2022-12-22 20:16:36 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:52:30 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
> <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > Hi Luca
> >
> > On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> > >
> > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher
> <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > > >
> > > > On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > > Severity: normal
> > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > > X-Debbugs-CC:
> pkg-dpdk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org zigo@debian.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Thomas and Release Team,
> > > > >
> > > > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to
> allow
> > > > > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS.
> This
> > > > > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both
> projects,
> > > > > as we have done for the past few releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if
> > > > > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to
> unstable,
> > > > > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to
> finish the
> > > > > transition.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable
> (no
> > > > > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at
> that
> > > > > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the
> > > > > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an
> > > > > exception.
> > > > >
> > > > > Would this plan work for everyone?
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the
> moreinfo
> > > > tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We are now ready. dpdk, openvswitch and ovn are ready in
> experimental.
> > > uhd and collectd in unstable will need a simple binary rebuild and
> are
> > > already compatible.
> >
> > Please go ahead
>
> Only src:uhd has been rebuilt, please rebuild src:collectd too (it only
> has Recommends instead of Depends as it's a plugin-based software, so
> it won't show in apt rdepends et al).
I'll schedule those builds once dpkd migrated. Otherwise the rebuilds
migrate before the recommends can be satisfied in testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: