Bug#1008495: transition: tinyobjloader
- To: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>, 1008495@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1008495: transition: tinyobjloader
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:07:59 +0100
- Message-id: <Y58Cn5c/t9qDNBjw@ramacher.at>
- Reply-to: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>, 1008495@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <164840204266.149196.99370713603252836.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de>
- References: <164840204266.149196.99370713603252836.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de> <164840204266.149196.99370713603252836.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Timo
On 2022-03-27 19:27:22 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I'd like to transition tinyobjloader for its new soname. Technically,
> this is a simple transition, the reverse dependencies build fine.
> However, the transition is unusual as it is not an official release, so
> allow me to explain my reasons.
>
> The initial upload was with 2.0.0~rc5 around April 2020, because it was
> required by Open3D at that time. Upstream assured me that a final 2.0
> release would be happening in early 2021. Some development occurred
> (which broke ABI backwards compatibility) and some bugs were fixed,
> among them CVE-2020-28589; however, the final release never
> materialized. Now, almost two years later, I find myself with an
> "in-between" ABI version that is no longer .so.1 but likely not
> .so.2 yet (the TODO still includes some "API polishing").
>
> It is impossible to predict when upstream will find the time to finish
> the 2.0 release, and I would like to have the bugfixes in Debian at some
> point. Given that this is only a minor package with few reverse depends,
> I felt it was fine to have this "in-between" transition now and the
> proper one with .so.2 whenever the final release happens. Let me know
> what you think.
Sorry, this transition was completely missed. Please go ahead.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: